Source freshness ยท Updated October 21, 2026
WTN Market source freshness scorecard for link research
Evaluate the age, revision history and present relevance of every source used in a WTN Market URL review. This guide treats WTN Market and WTNMarket search terms as research labels, not as proof that a destination is official or safe.
Measure freshness instead of guessing
A WTN Market link claim can remain visible long after the original publisher stopped maintaining it. Record the publication date, most recent meaningful edit and the date the source was last checked.
Treat an undated page as incomplete evidence. A fresh access time does not make an old claim current, so preserve both dates in the review record.
Score the kind of update
Separate editorial corrections, destination changes and cosmetic rewrites. Only a change that affects the public claim should increase the source freshness score.
A new footer year or automated timestamp should not outweigh an unchanged address statement. Note the exact sentence or field that changed.
Compare independent sources
Freshness becomes more useful when combined with provenance. Several recent copies of one old claim still represent one source chain, not multiple confirmations.
Group repeated claims under their earliest traceable origin and identify which sources supply genuinely new evidence.
Publish a bounded conclusion
State which sources were current on the review date and which remained stale or undated. Keep the WTN Market mirror card pending when current evidence is insufficient.
When a source changes materially, update the affected page, its visible review date and sitemap lastmod before sending that canonical URL to Bing.
Frequently asked questions
Does a recently accessed source count as recent evidence?
No. Access time and the date of the source claim are separate facts.
Should every automated timestamp improve a freshness score?
No. Only a meaningful change to the public claim should affect the score.